Ambassador profile
|
||
Name: | Sebastian Catanoiu | |
Function: | Park Manager | |
Country: | Romania | |
E-mail: | catanoius(at)yahoo(dot)com | |
Tel: | +40 72630 3240 | |
Organisation profile
|
||
Organisation: | Vanatori Neamt Nature Park | |
www: | www.vanatoripark.ro | |
E-mail: | vanatoripark(at)vanatoripark(dot)ro | |
Tel: | +40 23325 1060 | |
Established: | 1999 | |
Category: | Natural Park | |
Number of staff: | 17 |
Site profile | |||
Site name: |
|
||
|
|||
Location: | NE of Romania, Carphatian Mountains, Neamt county | ||
Land area: | 30,818 ha | ||
Nearest urban settlement: | Tirgu Neamt town, 4 communities | ||
Natura 2000 ID: | All the park area is proposed as a Natura 2000 site in provisional list for Romania. | ||
www: | www.vanatoripark.ro | ||
Annual visitor count: |
|
||
Majority of visitors from: | From all over Romania, 10% from abroad | ||
Site description: | The Vanatori Neamt Nature Park is a natural park. The main goal is the protection and conservation of landscapes where interaction between human activities and nature has taken place for many years. This interaction has created a specific area with significant landscape, cultural and biodiversity value. Other reserves can be found in the park area: Oak Reserve (56,6 ha) – cat.I - IUCN, Silver Forest (2 ha) – cat. IV –IUCN, Brass Wood (10,2 ha) – cat.IV – IUCN. |
|
|
All species | |||
Species code | Latin name | Common / local name | |
Alcedo athis | |||
Aquila pomarina | |||
Caprimulgus europaeus | |||
Ciconia ciconia | |||
Ciconia nigra | |||
Crex crex | |||
Dendrocopos medius | |||
Dryocopus martius | |||
Ficedula albicollis | |||
Ficedula parva | |||
Jynx torquilla | |||
Lanius collurio | |||
Lullula arborea | |||
Pernis apivorus | |||
Picus canus | |||
Bison bonasus | |||
Lynx lynx | |||
Lutra lutra | |||
Ursus arctos | |||
Canis lupus | |||
Myotis bechsteinii | |||
Cerambyx cerdo | |||
Carabus variolosus | |||
Morimus funereus | |||
Rosalia alpina | |||
Lucanus cervus | |||
All habitats (* indicates priority habitats) | ||
Habitat code | Common / local name | |
6230* | Species-rich Nardus grasslands, on silicious substrates in mountain areas (and submountain areas in Continental Europe) | |
6430 | Hydrophilous tall herb fringe communities of plains and of the montane to alpine levels | |
6510 | Lowland hay meadows (Alopecurus pratensis, Sanguisorba officinalis) | |
6520 | Mountain hay meadows | |
9130 | Asperulo-Fagetum beech forests | |
91V0 | Dacian Beech forests (Symphyto-Fagion) | |
Stakeholder profile | |||||
Stakeholder activity in the management planning process: | |||||
Stakeholder group | activity level | ||||
hi ← → nil | |||||
Central Government | |||||
Scientists | |||||
Private landowners | |||||
Green NGOs | |||||
Private sector | |||||
Private individuals | |||||
Foresters | |||||
Farmers | |||||
Port authorities | |||||
Anglers | |||||
Hunters | |||||
Recreational groups | |||||
Other: Schools | |||||
Stakeholder success stories | |
Small grant projects for local communities Different small grant projects are organised to involve local communities:
|
|
Bison reintroduction programme The Bison, apart
from its natural function as a keystone species, can serve as an excellent
flagship species for the promotion of nature conservation and the creation
of public awareness. Its very presence would also provide economic benefits
through an increased attractiveness of the region for eco-tourists,
naturalists, etc.
An example was the International conference ‘European Bison and local communities in Carpathians Mountains’( August 2006) with participation of experts from Carphatian countries, local authorities, local communities, NGOs, schools, etc. The main topic of the meeting was to analyse together with local communities and stakeholders the opportunities and threats for Bison in the Carphatian Mountains.
|
|
Certification of forest management The forest management certification process started in 2001 and in 2002 the certificate was awarded for the two forest districts inside the Park. The private harvest companies agreed this process even though it experienced some financial constraints at the beginning (funds to be invested in personal protection equipments, new machines etc). As proof that the private companies understand the benefits of forest management certification (environmental and economic), not only harvesting companies but also wood processing companies agreed to be certified (based on chain of custody). Nowadays, due to this process, which started at Vanatori Neamt Nature Park, FSC certified companies can be found throughout Romania.
|
|
Photo credit: Sebastian Catanoiu, Elena Curea, Razvan Deju, and Gabriel Hanganu. |
Communication profile | |
Activities and products for the communication of Natura 2000
|
|
Events | |
|
|
Event frequency | |
|
|
Use of seasonal workers / volunteers | |
|
|
Kind of work / volunteering opportunities | |
|
|
Communication literature produced | |
|
|
Communication target groups | |
|
|
The organisation has a dedicated communication strategy for Natura 2000 | |
|
|
Description of communication strategy | |
|
|
Site involved in joint working / networking | |
|
|
Details of joint working / networking activity | |
|
|
Key site management issues: | |
|
|
Integration of Natura 2000 in overall site management: | |
Ongoing. A new law for protected areas appeared in June 2007. According to this law, Natura 2000 will be included in the management plan of protected areas.
|
|
Key site management objectives: | |
The overall goal is to provide sustainable development of the entire microregion represented by the Park area using the nature protection and the sacred places as communication tools. The presence of the Bison, its iminent reintroduction and the presence of many monasteries, convents etc are the key elements to interest and involve the communities, local authorities and green NGOs, in the preservation and the sustainable usage of biodiversity and to increase public awareness.
|
|
Stakeholders targeted as part of management action: | |
|
|
Description of work carried out / methods and methodology: | |
The Park was established in 1999. Since then it is difficult to describe all the works and methods applied. For this reason we focus on the results of this methodology (see next sections - results of action and activities).
|
|
Results of action and activities: | |
|
|
Indication of budget allocation for these tasks: | |
|
|
Financial overview | |
Organisational budget for nature conservation (annual): | |
Our yearly budget assured only by National Forest Administration is $ 147,000 (approx. Euro 107,000) but this amount only covers the minimum necessities (salaries, fuel and cars reimbursements, stationary etc.). For specific nature conservation actions, extra money is necessary (also NFA provide such funds).
|
|
Budget reserved for communication: | |
There is no special chapter for communication in our budget. (for this, we use money from “Public awareness and education” chapter that represents $ 4,000 yearly (approx. Euro 2,900)).
|
|
European funding: | |
No
|