Ambassador profile
|
||
Name: | Philippe Della Valle | |
Function: | Natura 2000 Site Manager | |
Country: | France | |
E-mail: | pdellavalle(at)conservatoirelimousin.com | |
Tel: | +33 55503 9825 | |
Organisation profile
|
||
Organisation: | Conservatoire Régional des Espaces Naturels du Limousin | |
www: | www.conservatoirelimousin.com | |
E-mail: | info(at)conservatoirelimousin(dot)com | |
Tel: | +33 55503 2907 | |
Established: | 1990-2005 | |
Category: | NGO | |
Number of staff: | 25 |
Site profile | |||
Site name: | Landes et zones humides de la Haute Vézère (Haute Vézère) | ||
Location: | Corrèze, Limousin, FRANCE | ||
Land area: | 7,707 ha | ||
Nearest urban settlement: | Meymac, Bugeat | ||
Natura 2000 ID: | FR7401105 | ||
www: | none | ||
Annual visitor count: | Approximately 20- 50 000 | ||
Majority of visitors from: | Paris and other parts of Limousin | ||
Site description: | The site of the “Moors and wetlands of the Haute Vézère” is the oldest Natura 2000 site in the Limousin. It was established in 1996 by the CREN Limousin on behalf of the State. It covers a surface of 7707 hectares on the Plateau de Millevaches, in Corrèze, between 800 and 930 meters altitude. This altitude and geographical position results in a relatively challenging climate (with important precipitations and particularly long winters). The site comprises of eleven habitats of Community interest distributed on nearly 2135 hectares, consisting mainly of dry moors, meadows with Nardus stricta or peat bogs which all result from human activity in Limousin. 10 priority species were also listed there: Lutra lutra, Euphydrias aurinia, Coenagrion mercuriale or the Myotis myotis (see full list below). In the past the agriculture of the area has been dominated by the extensive bovine and ovine breeding (forty stockbreeders). This land was abandoned more than twenty years ago and more than half of the open priority habitats are abandoned. Thus, since the 1950's coniferous tree planting has become more important and stimulated competition between agriculture and forested land. Due to the very long winters large quantities of hay for the stockbreeders and large surfaces of meadows are necessary. In this context, the threats still weigh on the moors and lawns (reversal in meadows, plantation of Douglas trees) and to a lesser extent on the bog landscape (drainage). The Management Plan of the site created in 1998 was reviewed and developed in 2006. It envisages in particular many contractual measurements aiming at the maintenance or the return of the extensive pasture on the open landscape of the site, the conservation of the old leafy settlements and the safeguarding of the aquatic environments (due to the development of riverbanks or the reduction of the ponds' impacts on the rivers). |
|
|
All species | |||
Species code | Latin name | Common / local name | |
1044 | Coenagrion mercuriale | Agrion de Mercure | |
1065 | Euphydrias aurinia aurinia | Damier de la Succise | |
1078 | Euplagia quadripunctaria | Ecaille chinée | |
1083 | Lucanus cervus | Lucane cerf-volant | |
1308 | Barbastella barbastellus | Barbastelle | |
1323 | Myotis bechsteini | Murin de Bechstein | |
1324 | Myotis myotis | Grand Murin | |
1355 | Lutra lutra | Loutre d'Europe | |
1385 | Bruchia vogesiaca | Bruchie des Vosges | |
1831 | Luronium natans | Flûteau nageant | |
All habitats (* indicates priority habitats) | ||
Habitat code | Common / local name | |
3110 | Eaux oligotrophes | |
3260 | Rivières des étages planitaire à montagnard | |
4030 | Landes sèches européennes | |
6230* | Formations à Nardus | |
6410 | Prairies à Molinie | |
6430 | Mégaphobiaies eutrophes | |
7110* | Tourbières hautes actives | |
7120 | Tourbières hautes dégradées | |
7140 | Tourbiéres de transition et tremblants | |
7150 | Dépressions sur substrats tourbeux | |
9120 | Hêtraies atlantiques à houx | |
Stakeholder profile | |||||
Stakeholder activity in the management planning process: | |||||
Stakeholder group | activity level | ||||
hi ← → nil | |||||
Local Government | |||||
Central Government | |||||
Scientists | |||||
Private landowners | |||||
Green NGOs | |||||
Private sector | |||||
Private individuals | |||||
Foresters | |||||
Farmers | |||||
Anglers | |||||
Hunters | |||||
Recreational groups | |||||
Stakeholder success stories | |
Agro-environmental Aids Since
2001, CREN Limousin has set-up agro-environmental aids with agricultural
organizations, which are cofinanced until 2006 by FEOGA and French funds.
Measures consist of the extensive use of heathlands and peat bogs with
no fertilizers and low stock pressure during summer season. They are
five year contracts. Aids varied from € 111 ha/year and €
350 ha/year. |
|
Farmer Partnerships Restoration of many sites with local farming partnerships: CREN Limousin now manages approximately 2000 ha of Natura 2000 sites, of which 400 ha are open habitats. This represents 14 different small sites, managed with the help of 15 different farmers. |
|
Interpretation paths Setting up of 2 "interpretation paths" on the largest peat bog of Limousin, which are clearly a success, with more than 15000 visitors per year. The 2 interpretation
paths consist of a small one (1 km long) with panels showing typical
plants and animals of peatbogs, explaining peat origin and extraction. |
|
Photo credit: CREN Limousin |
Communication profile | |
Activities and products for the communication of Natura 2000
|
|
Events | |
|
|
Event frequency | |
|
|
Use of seasonal workers / volunteers | |
|
|
Communication literature produced | |
|
|
Communication target groups | |
|
|
The organisation has a dedicated communication strategy for Natura 2000 | |
|
|
Site involved in joint working / networking | |
|
|
|
|
Key site management issues: | |
|
|
Integration of Natura 2000 in overall site management: | |
|
|
Key site management objectives: | |
|
|
Stakeholders targeted as part of management action: | |
|
|
Description of work carried out / methods and methodology: | |
|
|
Results of action and activities: | |
|
|
Indication of budget allocation for these tasks: | |
|
|
Financial overview | |
Organisational budget for nature conservation (annual): | |
|
|
Budget reserved for communication: | |
|
|
European funding: | |
|